{"id":455,"date":"2026-06-30T16:43:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T16:43:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:43:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T16:43:08","slug":"supreme-court-backs-state-transgender-athlete-bans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Supreme Court backed state laws banning transgender girls from participating in scholastic girls\u2019 sports in a decision issued Tuesday, upholding a legal argument used by the Trump administration in seeking to ban transgender athletes nationwide.<\/p>\n

Read more Tom Kean returns to DC after months away and 140 missed votes<\/a><\/p>\n

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, in that turned aside challenges to West Virginia and Idaho laws, wrote that states could bar transgender girls from participating in women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports under the Constitution and Title IX, which governs civil rights in schools.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe question is whether Title IX permits schools to maintain women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports for biological females. The answer is yes,\u201d Kavanaugh wrote.<\/p>\n

Kavanaugh\u2019s decision pointed to \u201cinherent physical differences\u201d between girls and boys and pointed to potential safety and competitiveness concerns that justified the separation. Kavanaugh wrote those concerns were justified even when a potential athlete had taken puberty blockers or hormones to transition.<\/p>\n

Kavanaugh used similar reasons to reject claims that such bans violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Delving into assessments of whether individuals had the athletic ability to compete on boys and girls teams would involve endless, frustrating litigation, Kavanaugh wrote.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe questions would be endless (and bitter) and yield few, if any, principled answers. The Equal Protection Clause and this Court\u2019s precedents do not require such a quagmire,\u201d Kavanaugh wrote.<\/p>\n

Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion that emphasized that transgender status should not receive the same heightened judicial scrutiny of immutable characteristics such as race, sex or national origin, because \u201c\u2018gender dysphoria\u2019 is a mutable mental state that is the object of psychiatric treatment.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cA man does not have a legal right to compete against women just because he believes that he is a woman,\u201d Thomas wrote.<\/p>\n

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch also wrote a separate opinion that distinguished the cases decided Tuesday from a prior case he wrote, known as Bostock v. Clay County, which held that federal employment law under Title VII prohibits discrimination based on transgender status and gender identity.<\/p>\n

\u201cPut simply, it is a mistake to assume that, just because firing someone in part because of his biological sex amounts to unlawful discrimination in violation of Title VII, sponsoring a single-sex sports team limited to biological women or girls must also amount to unlawful discrimination in violation of Title IX,\u201d Gorsuch wrote.<\/p>\n

In the last several years, about half of the states across the country have passed laws similar to West Virginia and Idaho banning the participation of transgender girls in scholastic girls\u2019 sports.<\/p>\n

Read more Kids bill faces uncertainty after House passage<\/a><\/p>\n

Lower courts had ruled against the state bans, finding in various cases that they violated Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, which states no one should be discriminated against in education programs \u201con the basis of sex,\u201d and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.<\/p>\n

The states and the Trump administration asked the justices to uphold the state laws, arguing that they only defined participation in sports on the basis of biological sex and did not discriminate on transgender status.<\/p>\n

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, concurred in the portion of the decision that relied on Title IX. However, Sotomayor wrote that the justices should not have decided the constitutionality of the state laws without further litigation.<\/p>\n

Sotomayor said the justices should have sent the case back to lower courts to fully explore whether transgender athletes should be considered different once they have undergone gender-affirming treatment.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese circumstances demand exercising judicial restraint, not rushing to answer conclusively difficult questions without sufficient evidentiary development,\u201d Sotomayor wrote.<\/p>\n

\u201cSports, of course, are often zero sum, but the law need not and should not be,\u201d Sotomayor wrote.<\/p>\n

The decision comes as the Trump administration has sought to ban transgender girls from scholastic girls\u2019 sports nationwide through executive order, and the president has pushed members of his party to enact a similar ban through legislation.<\/p>\n

Earlier this term, the justices ruled against a state law ban on conversion therapy, finding that Colorado could not ban therapists from counseling their patients to \u201cconvert\u201d from their LGBTQ identity.<\/p>\n

Last term, the court\u2019s conservative majority upheld state laws banning minors from receiving gender-affirming care in U.S. v. Skrmetti, stating that such laws were within states\u2019 rights to regulate medical care. In that case, several justices wrote separately expressing doubts that transgender Americans could receive protection from discrimination under the Constitution based on their transgender identity.<\/p>\n

The cases are Bradley Little, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Idaho, et al. v. Lindsay Hecox, et al. and West Virginia, et al. v. B.P.J.<\/p>\n

Read more At the Races: Rocky Mountain High Stakes<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court backed state laws banning transgender girls from participating in scholastic girls\u2019 sports in a decision issued Tuesday, upholding a legal argument used by the Trump administration in seeking to ban transgender athletes nationwide. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, in a majority opinion that turned aside challenges to West Virginia and Idaho laws, wrote […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":454,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-policy"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans - American Industry Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans - American Industry Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court backed state laws banning transgender girls from participating in scholastic girls\u2019 sports in a decision issued Tuesday, upholding a legal argument used by the Trump administration in seeking to ban transgender athletes nationwide. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, in a majority opinion that turned aside challenges to West Virginia and Idaho laws, wrote […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Industry Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T16:43:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f31b66192ea99275704b1c4c1195d2bd\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T16:43:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455\"},\"wordCount\":810,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Policy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans - American Industry Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T16:43:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f31b66192ea99275704b1c4c1195d2bd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg\",\"width\":1620,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"UNITED STATES - JANUARY 13: Activists rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court hears arguments on trans athlete bans on Tuesday, January 13, 2026. (Bill Clark\\\/CQ Roll Call)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?p=455#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Industry Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f31b66192ea99275704b1c4c1195d2bd\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanindustryreview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans - American Industry Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans - American Industry Review","og_description":"The Supreme Court backed state laws banning transgender girls from participating in scholastic girls\u2019 sports in a decision issued Tuesday, upholding a legal argument used by the Trump administration in seeking to ban transgender athletes nationwide. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, in a majority opinion that turned aside challenges to West Virginia and Idaho laws, wrote […]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455","og_site_name":"American Industry Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T16:43:08+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f31b66192ea99275704b1c4c1195d2bd"},"headline":"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans","datePublished":"2026-06-30T16:43:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455"},"wordCount":810,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg","articleSection":["Policy"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455","url":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455","name":"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans - American Industry Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-30T16:43:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f31b66192ea99275704b1c4c1195d2bd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/9c5f6f9592b48220d16949456308111e.jpg","width":1620,"height":1080,"caption":"UNITED STATES - JANUARY 13: Activists rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court hears arguments on trans athlete bans on Tuesday, January 13, 2026. (Bill Clark\/CQ Roll Call)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?p=455#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court backs state transgender athlete bans"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/","name":"American Industry Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f31b66192ea99275704b1c4c1195d2bd","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanindustryreview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/454"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanindustryreview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}